Incident response
Restoring critical systems after a ransomware incident
In March 2024, a ransomware incident disrupted three business-critical applications and their databases. I handled initial containment, led network and workstation restoration, and worked with an external specialist on the subsequent investigation. We identified 8Base ransomware and later found a likely source of exposed database credentials in a legacy desktop application. My follow-up work established security training and a reporting channel for suspicious emails, and I gained authority to begin moving on-premises infrastructure to Azure.
- Initial response
- Containment
- Recovery
- Parallel workstreams
- Critical service
- Next morning
- Further restoration
- About 3 weeks
The incident
On Monday morning the 4th of March 2024, I was asked to look at a workstation displaying a ransom message. Other machines were affected, and staff were already having difficulty accessing LeaseCore. I stopped workstation activity and moved to contain the incident before more systems were affected.
My role
I isolated the office from external connectivity, stopped access to the affected business applications, contacted the part-time IT manager and briefed the board on next steps. We divided the recovery into parallel workstreams: he took responsibility for servers and databases, while I took responsibility for the network and end-user devices. I also preserved available evidence before server restoration began.
What I did
Contain the incident and preserve evidence
I stopped device use, isolated the network and kept company-issued devices onsite. I investigated the immediate scope of the incident and captured available volatile memory and process information before the IT manager began restoring the servers. He confirmed that protected database backups were available and led the server and database recovery.
Restore a usable working environment
I prepared six clean Windows installation drives and reimaged workstations in parallel. I then reinstalled Microsoft 365 and the locally installed quoting client, and reset affected network-connected equipment as part of preparing the environment for reconnection. This work ran alongside the server and database restoration.
Investigate the intrusion and the likely credential exposure
Following the recovery, I worked with an external incident-response specialist to investigate how the attack unfolded. We identified the ransomware as 8Base, a variant of the Phobos ransomware family, and traced the likely initial entry point to a malicious email attachment received from a compromised partner financier.
The investigation also uncovered a significant vulnerability in PackEdge, our locally installed quoting application. Its compiled executable contained database credentials in readable plaintext. Because PackEdge connected directly to the database, we identified this as the most likely source of the credentials used by the attackers to access our databases.
However, the available logs and memory dumps did not provide sufficient evidence to confirm that the attackers had obtained the credentials from PackEdge. The finding nevertheless exposed a serious security weakness, and required that the application’s owner remediate the vulnerability.
Turn the investigation into practical prevention
I required the owner of PackEdge to address the plaintext database credentials bundled with the installed client. I also asked the IT manager to strengthen email scanning and threat detection in our Microsoft environment. Those were separate remediation requests; my role was to identify the risks and press for them to be addressed.
I implemented twice yearly cybersecurity awareness training focused on email diligence, tailoring sessions to situations employees encountered in their day-to-day work. I also made cybersecurity training mandatory for new employees during onboarding.
I set up a dedicated cyber-threat reporting inbox so anyone in the business could ask for help with a suspicious email, attachment or other potential threat. Most reports were false alarms, but the inbox gave staff a clear action to take instead of making the decision alone. It also surfaced a highly targeted spear-phishing campaign aimed at the operations manager and both directors.
Establish a path away from on-premises infrastructure
The longer-term outcome was that I was given authority to begin moving on-premises infrastructure to Azure. The incident and follow-up investigation turned infrastructure modernisation from a proposed improvement into an authorised workstream. That authority was the outcome at this stage; it should not be confused with a completed cloud migration.
The result
Working in parallel, we restored critical applications and enough clean equipment for the business to resume by 9:00 am the following morning. Lower-priority restoration continued over the next three weeks. Protected backups limited the amount of database data requiring reconstruction.
My contribution covered initial containment, evidence preservation, network and workstation restoration, investigation, security-awareness training and the new threat-reporting process. The IT manager remained responsible for server and database restoration. The investigation identified a likely initial email entry point and a separate, plausible source of database credential exposure. The intrusion and investigation led to my being authorised to start moving on-premises infrastructure to Azure.